Bitcoin briefly dipped below $60,000 on 5-6 Feb amid a sharp sell-off that erased roughly 14% in value in a single day.
The drawdown pushed BTC into a dense technical confluence, where the realized cap cost basis around $55,000 converges with the 200-week moving average near $58,000, a level that has historically acted as a structural floor.
Bitcoin has only traded below this long-term average for a sustained period once: during the 2022 bear market. As such, this zone represents a critical area to monitor and would likely serve as the next key support level should downside pressure resume.
The coin rebounded on 6 Feb to reclaim $68,500. However, the market structure underpinning this recovery remains fragile, with the bounce driven more by derivatives positioning and technical reflexivity than a clear improvement in underlying market conditions.
Short-term holders still selling
Long-term holders and miners had had been selling as far back as the northern summer into late Q4. By the time the November dip occurred most of those divestments were complete, it would seem.
Current sell pressure is overwhelmingly driven by late market participants. Investors holding Bitcoin for under 155 days, known in industry jargon as 'short-term holders' (STH) are exiting in droves as price slipped below their cost basis, now estimated at above $90,000. They're historically more sensitive to downside volatility and prone to selling under stress.
Chart
(Source: Research Bitcoin Lab)
This marks the third instance in the past three months where realized losses among short-term holders have spiked to high-stress levels, a pattern consistent with capitulation dynamics. Over 5 Feb alone, short-term holders realized approximately $4.8bn in losses, highlighting the intensity of the current washout.
Market liquidity conditions are not helping either, exacerbating price swings rather than absorbing them. Over the past 24 hours, roughly $2bn in positions were liquidated.
Notably, roughly 80% of these liquidations came from long positions, with just 20% from shorts, according to Coinglass. The imbalance reflects a classic saloon-door market dynamic: sharp, reflexive bounces briefly wrong-foot short sellers, while repeated, leverage-driven attempts by long traders to catch the bottom ultimately give way to cascading liquidations as downside pressure resumes.
Chart
(Source: Coin Metrics)
Annualized funding rates spiked twice during the sell-off. First after the $80,000–$75,000 break and again during the sharp leg from $75,000 to $60,000. In both instances, annualized funding surged above 7% while price was still declining, pointing to leveraged longs entering early in search of a bottom. Historically, this behaviour has been more indicative of weak positioning than of real underlying demand.
At the same time, perpetual futures trading volume surged, peaking at roughly $156bn, nearly doubling from prior sessions, reflecting reactive positioning and short-term speculation, not constructive accumulation.
Taken together, elevated funding rates and surging volumes point to a weak market structure dominated by leverage-driven flows, mechanically amplifying volatility. While such conditions can support sharp, reflexive bounces, these moves tend to be short-lived unless accompanied by a meaningful reset in leverage and positioning, along with follow-through in the spot market, which has yet to materialize.
IBIT hits record activity
BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) recorded a new all-time high in trading activity on 5 Feb, crossing $10bn in daily volume. At this scale, the ETF has effectively become the primary liquidity venue for Bitcoin spot exposure, increasingly concentrating price discovery within US trading hours.
As a result, intra-day volatility during US sessions now carries outsized downstream effects, driven by ETF share creation and redemption flows rather than purely offshore crypto-native markets.
Chart
Despite the violent price action and traded volume, ETF net outflows remain relatively modest, with IBIT posting just $434.1mn in net outflows on the day, suggesting that additional mechanisms beyond outright ETF selling are driving market dynamics.
Alongside spot volumes, IBIT options trading also reached record levels, marking the highest daily options volume since launch.
The IBIT option leg
Digging into the options surface, IBIT options are heavily skewed toward out-of-the-money calls. This pattern is less indicative of outright bullish speculation and more consistent with systematic covered-call activity, where holders sell upside to monetize elevated implied volatility.
This structure is largely enabled by IBIT’s in-kind creation and redemption mechanism, which allows investors to contribute native BTC directly to the ETF and receive shares without selling the underlying asset. By doing so, long-term Bitcoin holders gain access to deep institutional liquidity rails and listed options markets, all while avoiding spot market impact.
As a result, IBIT has emerged as a natural vehicle for yield-oriented strategies among sophisticated allocators. By overwriting calls against a structural long position, investors can harvest volatility premiums and generate steady USD income without liquidating core holdings. This effectively places Bitcoin in a TradFi shell, monetizing volatility while maintaining a clear path to unwind exposure back into native BTC.
Hedge consequences
However, this structure is not without consequences. When investors sell calls, market makers take the other side and become long call options. To hedge this exposure, dealers short the underlying asset. As prices rise, dealers must increase their short positions to remain delta-neutral, mechanically selling into strength.
The problem emerges when the market reverses. As prices fall, dealers are forced to adjust their hedges rapidly, either by reducing short exposure or re-establishing it at lower levels under rising volatility. Hedging flows can amplify downside moves, particularly when volatility increases, reducing liquidity. What might have been a controlled drawdown descends into a disorderly sell-off.
The impact of dealer-driven 'negative convexity' heightens as options trading volume expands. Higher options volume means more contracts outstanding and, critically, larger hedging requirements for dealers, compounding the drop.
Options now represent a growing share of IBIT open interest, with the IBIT leverage ratio back on the rise after resetting from its November spike. This ratio captures how much embedded leverage is present in IBIT through derivatives relative to spot ETF exposure. As options activity increases, more directional and convex risk is layered on top of the underlying ETF, even if spot holdings remain stable.
